POLITICS
·
Politics refers to the art or science of
running governmental or state affairs, including behavior within civil governments, but
also applies to institutions, fields, and special interest groups such as the corporate, academic, and
religious
segments of society.
·
It consists of "social relations
involving authority or power"
and to the methods and tactics used to formulate and apply policy.
·
Modern political discourse focuses on
democracy and the relationship between people and politics. It is thought of as
the way we "choose government officials and make decisions about public
policy
Political science is a social science
discipline concerned with the study of the state, government, and politics.
Aristotle defined it as the study of the state.
It deals extensively with the theory and practice of politics, and the
analysis of political
systems and political behavior.
Politics
as an art of government
·
This is the traditional definition of
politics, based upon the original meaning of the term in ancient Greek
Civilization. The word 'Politics' is derived from the Greek word 'Polis'
literally meaning city-state.
·
Ancient Greece consisted of
independent city states, each of which had its own system of government.
Politics refers to the affairs of the 'Polis' or what concerns the state. This
is the classical view of political science.
·
According to J. W. Garner,
"................... political science begins and ends with the
state". The study of politics concerns itself with the life of man in
relation to organized state. Paul Janet states,
·
Hence, the state came to occupy the
central place in politics. The ethical basis of the state, its evolution, the
functions it is supposed to perform, its relationship with individuals became
the main concern of political science.
·
Since the state performs its functions
through the government, its main forces remained on the personnel and machinery
of government. To study politics essentially meant the study of government or
more broadly the study of authority.
·
David Easton defined politics as the
"authoritative allocation of values"
by this he meant that politics includes all those processes through which
government allocates benefits, rewards or penalties. This is how it meets the
demands and needs of society.
·
The distribution of such benefits,
rewards or penalties is called authoritative because these are widely accepted
in society and considered binding by the people. Hence, politics involves
formal policies or authoritative decisions made by the government.
·
A major problem with this definition
is that it presents a limited view of politics as essentially the affairs of
state and government, thereby involving only a limited group of people engaged
in the management of government as well as those trying to influence it. This
implies that most people, most institutions and most social activities are considered
as being outside politics.
Politics
as public affairs
Another notion of politics takes it beyond a
narrow focus on government to what is thought of as 'Public Life' or 'Public
affairs'. The public sphere of life can be considered as 'Political' whereas
the private sphere of life remains 'non-political'.
The roots of such a view of politics can be
located in the writings of the famous Greek Philosopher Aristotle. In his book
'Polities', he said that "man is by
nature a political animal". By this, he meant that human beings could
live 'the good life' only within a political community.
Hence, politics is a moral activity essential
for creating a 'just society'. In
other words, politics is a noble activity precisely because of its public
character. This is the reason for which Aristotle describes politics as the
'master science'.
However, the distinction between 'public life'
and 'private life' needs to be clarified. There are two ways of understanding
this distinction.
According to the traditional approach
institutions of state can be regarded as public. Hence politics is restricted
to the activities of the state which is considered responsible for managing the
collective problems of the community. Those areas of social life like the
economic, cultural, artistic, personal, domestic, etc. which, the individuals
manage for themselves are considered 'nonpolitical'.
The other approach to 'public/private'
division takes note of the fact that besides the state there are many other
institutions which are opening, which operate in public and the public has
access to these.
Institutions such as business, factory, trade
unions, church, university and other community groups come to be considered as
public and hence political. This definition of politics, however, excludes
disagreements and conflicts emerging in the private or personal sphere. It is
strongly believed that politics does not and should not interfere in personal
affairs and institutions.
Politics
as compromise
Politics is commonly called the "art of
compromise." This label is thought to be especially appropriate for
democratic politics.
Elected officials representing different
voters meet in legislative chambers to hammer out policies that all
constituents can live with. Of course, no politicians or voters receive
everything they want in the final legislative package:
The need to assemble at least a simple
majority to implement any policy almost invariably means that supporters of
some policy must sacrifice something of value to others active in the political
process
Few doubt that politics is indeed the art of
compromise. politicians who refuse to compromise seldom win and hold on to
office for the obvious reason that uncompromising politicians garner too little
to send home to voters.
Successful politicians early on learn the
survival value of compromise. Economist Donald Wittman (1995: 154) correctly
observes, "That is what good politicians do: create coalitions and find
acceptable compromises." Political philosopher Jean Bethke Elshtain (1995:
61) is almost rhapsodic about democratic compromise: “But compromise is not a ordinary
way to do politics; it is an adventure, the only way to do democratic
politics.”
While the centrality of compromise to politics
is beyond question, we argue that the current story of political compromise is
misleadingly incomplete. Our argument is built of two points. First, that
politics is the art of compromise only at the level of legislative activity;
politics is not the art of compromise at the ballot box. While compromise by
elected officials is necessary for the successful political careers of these
officials, the argument is that the institutional structure of democratic
elections causes voters to seek representatives who at least appear to be
uncompromising.
A complication for elected officials is that
many voters also want their representatives to bring home the cake. Because
bringing home the cake requires compromise with other legislators, each
legislator confronts the difficult task of being an expert compromiser in
legislatures while appearing to voters to be an uncompromising champion of
principle.
Politics as concensus
This is a method where the ruling party uses a
system of asking the various sides in an argument to put forward their own
ideas and then trying for find a consensus,
which is a agreement that all parties can agree
with. By getting all sides to contribute their own ideas, the final agreement
is built with input from all sides of the question, rather than one group
over-ruling all the others, with their power.
Consensus is a hall mark of a mature nation's
ability to make good laws with agreement from all sides of the political
spectrum.
Politics as power
Power politics is a
form of international relations in which sovereign entities
protect their own interests by threatening one another with military, economic or political
aggression.
Power politics is essentially a way of
understanding the world of international relations: nations compete for the
world's resources and it is to a nation's advantage to be manifestly able to
harm others. It prioritizes national self-interest over the interest of other
nations or the international community.
Techniques of power politics include, but are
not limited to, conspicuous nuclear
development, pre-emptive strike, blackmail, the
massing of military units on a border, the imposition of tariffs or economic sanctions etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment